Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 08:19

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Exclusive | Ken Moelis to Step Down as CEO of His Investment Bank - WSJ
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
How can AI help interior designers?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Measles Exposure Prompts Health Warning In Bay Area - Patch
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Is it possible to legally adopt a family member?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
New study finds strong link between hearing loss and dementia - WKRC
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
401(k) Stats Suggest Americans Still Confident - Newser
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.